Published  29/03/2010
Share:  

CRASH (Homage to JG Ballard)

Code, interactivity and network, transport you back to childhood delights.

Decode: Digital Design Sensations
V&A Museum, London
8 December 2009–11 April 2010

by MK PALOMAR

Although digital is not necessarily virtual, the majority of works in the V&A’s Decode: Digital Design Sensations exhibition are virtually realised. The show combines three main issues: Code, Interactivity and Network. “Some works exist in a state of perpetual evolution others are generated by the behaviour of the spectator.”1 Walking through the dark space, lit by the glow of flat screens, LED’s and projections, I kept hearing “Wow” as the audience; being the essential participatory components in this responsive show, were continually amazed by the technology. To coin a much repeated cinematic phrase; “... we’re not in Kansas anymore,”2 but we are perhaps now, revisiting a contemporary version of those sensations experienced by early film audiences, astonished when suddenly faced with a approaching train.

Whether you interpret the binary digital code of 1 and 0 from a Sadie Plant3 Cartesian duality male (phallus) and female (lack) viewpoint, a Hindu algebraic or a Greek astronomical perspective, we have many to thank for this current technological revolution (well documented by Dr Aleks Krotoski4). Early mathematicians and astronomers (Zero), Babbage (the computer), Turing (the coding), Berners-Lee (the internet) and Steven Sasson (Kodak digital camera) are amongst numerous inventive minds that have contributed to our extraordinary contemporary connectedness, and to losing our stomachs in imax cinemas as we leap after flying Avatars.5 All of this, sensation prodding and virtual interactive digital imagery, has for the younger generation, who began their education clutching mice rather than pencils, become part of their everyday.

The entrance to Decode: Digital Design Sensations is a dark dream like path lined either side with what appear to be long bulrushes. Dan Roosegaarde’s Dune (2007), reed beds of bright white LEDs, are triggered by movement, they flicker and chirrup. You can’t help but stretch out your hand to disturb these long wavy lights, a modern day “fingers dragging through long grass” sensation. Some exhibits directly reference antique toys. C.E.B. Reas’s TI (2004), six circular floor projections uses “Processing”, an open source program environment to construct his continually changing images. Visually they are kaleidoscopic, the pattern growing from a central point remind me of the late Shelagh Cluett’s digitally manipulated mosaics, fractured details composed into waves.6 Digital Zeotrope (2008) is an extraordinary spinning barrel, commissioned by the innovative onedotzero, and made by the collaborative Troika.7 I can’t understand how this modern day magic lantern works. The lit drum is spinning, and there are lines of type projected from the inside, also spinning at different speeds from each other. There is no physical interaction with this work but it is mystifying and triggers many cinematic connections.

I remember hearing a scientist on the radio, explaining relativity as being like the sensation you feel when the train you are in pulls alongside another, and for a second you can’t tell which one of you is moving. That physical jolt; the rug pulled out from your perceptions, keeps happening throughout this exhibition. Robert Hodgin’s Solar (2009) is a sound responsive work; the screen image separates into floating planets if you blow loudly into the microphone. This satisfying interaction transports me back to happy science museum visits. While Yoke’s Dandelion (2009), a film of a giant seed head, offers a hair dryer to blow off the seeds, and has me toddling through shoulder high grass in some warm summer garden a long time ago.

Karsten Schmidt uses code and open source technologies in interdisciplinary practice and collaborative working. Schmidt’s Social Collider is a live map of twitter, tiny coloured threads trace correspondences between twitters across a screen, and we can read what people are saying to each other. Following these twitter connections, I wonder, what is the difference between armchair voyeurism, and people watching?

Audience watches audience interacting with Daniel Rozin’s Weave Mirror (2007). Rozin interviewed by V&A, reminds us that artists have long employed the newest tools available, “interactivity, point of view, human perception, image creation, participation etc – ... artists have always used new technologies for their art.” Weave Mirror requires a stillness of the subject, in order to reflect back a tonal shape on a grid of swivelling metal crescents. Fabrica’s Venetian Mirror also has school children motionless. Like Victorian subjects, holding their breath for fear of blurring, they watch themselves being imaged into a large baroque frame. But it is Ross Phillips’s Videogrid (2008) that causes the most giggling in the show. Divided into 25 mini screens, footage of one second loops show Key Stone Cop antics of slap stick delight. This hypnotically satisfying, visual game is instant and repeated gratification,8 together with people watching people watching themselves.

Perhaps technology advances faster than our senses, because rather than changing our sensations through new technological experiences, these most contemporary images and gadgets continue to evoke familiar childlike sensations. Giddy from all the bright lights and saturated colours, I leave this engaging exhibition trailing my fingers through Dan Roosegaarde’s reeds and setting off an applause of flashes and chirrups. Dorothy has left the building.

References

1. Decode Digital Design sensations V&A catalogue 2010.

2. The Wizard of Oz, 1939, directed by Victor Fleming. Dorothy (played by Judy Garland) having just arrived in Oz looks at the unfamiliar surroundings and says to her dog “Toto I’ve a feeling we’re not in Kansas anymore

3. Sadie Plant, Zeros and Ones, UK:Fourth Estate 1997 http://www.contemporarywriters.com/authors/?p=auth107

4. Dr Aleks Krotoski, writer and presenter of The Virtual Revolution: How 20 years of the Web has reshaped our lives. BBC television 2010.  http://www.bbc.co.uk/virtualrevolution/presenter.shtml

5. Avatar 2009 written and directed by James Cameron. Cameron co developed a photographic process that mimics the vision of the human eye, and a virtual camera that allows the filmmaker to move through virtual terrain. Avatars stereoscopic 3D process seamlessly blends  live action with computer generated imagery
www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Avatar-How-James-Camerons-3D-film-change-face-cinema-forever.html

6. Shelagh Cluett (1947-2007) Sculpture and teacher at Chelsea College of Art http://shelaghcluett.com/

7. Onedotzero, collaborators in this exhibition were “conceived at the start of the desktop digital revolution in the mid 1990’s...” and are “a contemporary, digital arts organisation with a remit to promote innovation across all forms of moving image and motion arts.” www.onedotzero.com

8. Sigmund Freud, Beyond the Pleasure Principle, J. Strachey editor, New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation, 1961.  Fort Da is a game that Freud watched his grandson playing. Fort meaning gone and Da meaning there. Freud witnessed his grandsons satisfaction and interpreted this repeated game as a way in which his grandson could emotionally cope with the absence and return of his mother.

Follow us twitter facebook instagram

Click on the pictures below to enlarge

Rafael Pérez Evans – interview: ‘Food contains a lot of emotion’

Rafael Pérez Evans talks about growing up in a farming community in rural Spain, queer and rural sh...

Night Fever: Designing Club Culture

With nightclubs facing massive uncertainty after more than a year of closure, the V&A Dundee’s exh...

Epilogue: Michael West’s Monochrome Climax

West’s willingness to take risks and reject stylistic uniformity shines through in this exhibition...

Kusama: Cosmic Nature

In a joyous coupling of art with nature, Yayoi Kusama’s cheering and restorative polka dots and pu...

Idris Khan – interview: ‘There was a struggle making these works’

Idris Khan talks about his new works at Victoria Miro, freaking out in lockdown and encapsulating a ...

Clare Patey – interview: ‘People don’t take humour seriously enough...

Clare Patey talks about 25 years of creating and producing powerful, participatory, public artworks ...

Art for SDGs: Kitakyushu Art Festival – Imagining Our Future

The premise of this 11-day festival is that art can draw attention to the state of our planet and pr...

Markus Lüpertz: Recent Paintings

A suite of new works by the German painter Markus Lüpertz, exploring the theme of Arcadia, mix insc...

Mika Tajima: Regulation

For her debut solo exhibition in the UK, the New York-based artist Mika Tajima focuses on the ways i...

Sam McKinniss: Country Western

A suite of works by the New York painter form a tribute to the stars of country music, the power of ...

Rubens to Sickert: The Study of Drawing

With a wide range of drawings, including works by Rubens, Charles Keene, Sickert and Whistler, this ...

Hurvin Anderson – interview: ‘I am looking at where things collide, ho...

The unsettling depictions of nature in Hurvin Anderson’s new paintings, based on photos from a 201...

Jadé Fadojutimi – interview: ‘I bathe in the conversations between co...

Jadé Fadojutimi talks about how lockdown enriched her practice, her obsession with Japan, her Liver...

Armin Linke – interview: ‘We have to look at different categories of p...

The film-maker and photographer discusses recording the evolution of human-environment relations, th...

Julie Mehretu

Mehretu’s vision is both epic and intimate and this survey of 25 years of her craft is a measure o...

Modal Painting

Through the works of Frank Bowling, John Hoyland, Reginald Sylvester II, John Golding and Sam Gillia...

Ayashii: Decadent and Grotesque Images of Beauty in Modern Japanese Art

This exhibition explores Japanese artists’ notion of beauty in the late-18th to the early 20th cen...

Off the Record

Twelve artists feature in this show, with works that examine the nature of official records and how ...

Rachel Whiteread – interview: ‘I’ve always picked things up. I’m a...

Rachel Whiteread, whose new show is at the Gagosian in London, talks about the pandemic, dump-diggin...

Lina Ghotmeh – interview: ‘Sometimes I wonder whether I am constructin...

Lina Ghotmeh, the Lebanese-born, Paris-based architect discusses her methodology of architecture as ...

The Essential Louis Kahn – book review

A photographic cornucopia of Kahn’s buildings, this highly visual publications takes its reader on...

Private art museums – ‘I like to collect by myself and make decisions ...

It takes more than wealth and success to run a museum, so why do so many collectors decide to go it ...

Artes Mundi 9

The six shortlisted artists for 2021 explore colonialism, environmental breakdown and contentious hi...

Frick Madison provides temporary home for the Frick Collection

The superstars have been realigned as the old Whitney Breuer hosts the Frick Collection with surpris...

Matt Jukes – interview: ‘You need to dream big, so you can shoot for t...

Matt Jukes talks about the pandemic, the effect of lockdown on our mental health, and his immersive,...

Mohamed Bourouissa – interview: ‘I see art as a playground’

Ahead of Mohamed Bourouissa's survey exhibition at Goldsmiths Centre for Contemporary Art, the Paris...

Valerie Hird: What Did Happen to Alice; My Avatar

Valerie Hird’s exhibition includes her award-winning animated short film along with interactive st...

Grief and Grievance: Art and Mourning in America

Full of the pain of black experience, the works here make the galleries thrum and shimmer with energ...

The Art Museum in Modern Times – book review

Charles Saumarez Smith, a former director of London’s National Portrait Gallery and the National G...

Art appreciation in the metaverse

What on the physical earth do art collectors see in a CryptoPunk? Add to quick profits the bragging-...

studio international logo

Copyright © 1893–2021 Studio International Foundation.

The title Studio International is the property of the Studio International Foundation and, together with the content, are bound by copyright. All rights reserved.

twitter facebook instagram

Studio International is published by:
the Studio International Foundation, PO Box 1545,
New York, NY 10021-0043, USA