Nam June Paik at Tate Modern, 2019, Installation view. Photo: © Tate (Andrew Dunkley).
Tate Modern, London
17 October 2019 – 9 February 2020
by BETH WILLIAMSON
Born in Seoul, Korea (now South Korea), Nam June Paik (1932-2006) lived and worked in Japan, Germany and the United States. It is difficult to know how to describe him. He was an artist, a classically trained musician, an inventor, a technophile and, above all, a visionary. In the early 1960s, his radical experimental art attracted the attention of George Maciunas, the founder member of Fluxus, an international group of experimental artists who frequently used written scores or instructions to create anarchic live performances. In 1964, Maciunas marked Paik out as a traitor to Fluxus for his involvement in an experimental musical drama by the composer Karlheinz Stockhausen. Despite this, Paik continued to take inspiration from Fluxus and bring artists, composers and performer together throughout his career. Communication, and particularly television, was Paik’s starting point. In 1969, he said:
“(I want) to shape the TV screen canvas
as precisely as Leonardo
as freely as Picasso
as colourfully as Renoir
as violently as Pollock
and as lyrically as Jasper Johns.”
Nam June Paik. TV Buddha 1974. Installation view, Tate Modern 2019. 18th century wooden sculpture, closed-circuit television camera and JVC Videosphere cathode-ray tube television. Stedelijk Museum, Amsterdam. Photo: © Tate (Andrew Dunkley).
Nam June Paik. One Candle (also known as Candle TV) 2004. Installation view, Tate Modern 2019. Cathode-ray tube television casing with additions in permanent oil marker, acrylic paint and live candle, 35.6 x 40.6 x 40.6 cm. Courtesy the Estate of Nam June Paik. Photo: © Tate (Andrew Dunkley).
If this exhibition is anything to go by then Paik certainly achieved his wish in a body of work that is equally as precise as it is free, as colourful as it is monochrome, and as violent as it is lyrical. All of these traits come together in works that are often concerned with mobilising the viewer in a curiously engaging fashion. In his experiments in technology and participation, Paik was interested in democratising his medium while, at the same time, making the viewer more aware of the physical aspects of the technology at play. This, and his lifelong exploration of Zen Buddhism, led to works such as Zen for Film (1964), a 20-minute long, blank film to be watched as any other film while becoming increasingly conscious of the projector, the screen, the dust and the scratches on the film and the shadow of ourselves and other viewers. It is a meditation of sorts and this links it to later works such as TV Buddha (1974) and One Candle (Candle TV) (2004). In another related work, One Candle (Candle Projection) (1989), a CCTV camera is focused on a single candle flame. Video projectors repeat the image across the gallery walls and become a source of light and a subject for our reflection.
Nam June Paik. One Candle (Candle Projection) 1989. Installation view, Tate Modern 2019. Close-circuit television camera, tripod, candle on custom stand and four to six colour video projectors including modified CRT projectors. Museum für Moderne Kunst, Frankfurt am Main.
Paik’s TV Garden (1974-77) is a cornucopia of sound and vision. Imagining a landscape where technology is integrated into the natural world, Paik places multiple TV sets among living plants, as viewers look on across a garden room where elements that should be at odds with one another appear somehow coherent and integrated. The room cannot be entered and, in this installation at least, visitors pressed up to its only opening to glimpse the wonders within.
Nam June Paik. TV Garden 1974-1977 (2002). Installation view, Tate Modern 2019. Live plants, cathode-ray tube televisions and video, colour, sound installation dimensions variable. Kunstsammlung Nordrhein-Westfalen, Dusseldorf. Photo: © Tate (Andrew Dunkley).
Paik was a frequent collaborator. Whether it was the expertise of technology companies, the instrumental skills of musicians or the shared interests of fellow artists such as John Cage, Merce Cunningham and Joseph Beuys, Paik worked openly with others. One of his best-known collaborations was with the “topless cellist” Charlotte Moorman. Their join interests in avant-garde music, live performance and what they saw as the sexuality of classical music, sustained their collaborative performances for almost 30 years.
Nam June Paik. Charlotte Moorman with TV Cello and TV Eyeglasses, 1971. Photograph, gelatin silver print. Lent by the Peter Wenzel Collection, Germany.
Moorman often performed semi-naked and, in 1967, she was arrested for indecent exposure during a performance in New York. The response from Paik was to construct several television sculptures that Moorman could use as costumes or props during her performances. In works such as TV Bra for Living Sculpture (1969), TV Cello (1971) and TV Eyeglasses (1971), he also aimed to show how humanity and technology could co-exist, or even merge. Following Moorman’s death in 1991, Paik made a number of works dedicated to her, including Room for Charlotte Moorman (1993). Remnants of that room appear in this exhibition as items of clothing that belonged to Moorman hang in the gallery, as if to remind us of her absent presence.
Nam June Paik. Sistine Chapel 1993. Installation view, Tate Modern 2019. Medium Video projectors, metal, wood, custom video switchers and four video channels, colour, sound. Courtesy of the Estate of Nam June Paik. Photo: © Tate (Andrew Dunkley).
In 1993, in another collaboration of sorts, Paik and the artist Hans Haacke were invited to jointly represent Germany at the Venice Biennale. One of the key works Paik exhibited was Sistine Chapel (1993). This immersive video installation filled one wing of the pavilion on that occasion. It used every available surface including the ceiling, and 42 projectors played simultaneously and randomly switched between four different videos. The audiovisual collage included new footage as well as extracts from past videos by Paik. It involved Paik’s friends, collaborators and public figures of the period and was essentially a summary of his career with video. Sistine Chapel (1993) is presented again in this exhibition for the first time since its creation. It is a mesmerising assault on the senses – a collage of light, colour and sound, fragmented and overlaid in a manner that sucks you in. As exhibitions go, it is surely the finale that Paik deserves. It is bright, brash, intelligent and simply joyous.
Nam June Paik. Internet Dream 1994. Install view, Tate Modern 2019. Ten 20-inch cathode-ray tube televisions, forty-two 13-inch cathode-ray tube televisions,custom-made video wall system, steel frame and three video channels, colour, sound, 287 x 380 x 80 cm. ZKM Centre for Art and Media, Karlsruhe.
Nam June Paik at Tate Modern, 2019, Installation view. Photo: © Tate (Andrew Dunkley).
The extent of Paik’s imagination and vision is surely evident enough in his work, but if verbal confirmation were ever needed, he gave that too. Forty-five years ago, in 1974, he predicted: “TV will gain many branches … Picture-Phone, tele-facimile, two-way inter-active TV for shopping, library research, opinion polling, health consultation, inter-office data transmission, and … 1001 new applications … a new nuclear energy in information and society-building, which I would call tentatively ‘BROADBAND COMMUNICATION NETWORK’.”
In today’s world of the world wide web and the internet of things, Paik’s predictions of 1974 could not have been more prescient. In this exhibition, Paik’s robots, machines, instruments and other artworks appear not as relics of a bygone age but as shadows of the present day, eerie predicators of our contemporary condition.
Daniel Buren and his Invention Trajectory
Daniel Buren has had a stimulating and now distinguished continuity in Britain. The arrival of his exhibition, 'Invention II', at Modern Art Oxford recalls a long association, firstly with MOMA Oxford (1973) and in the pages of Studio International. His own texts here are notable for their clarity and perspicacity.
Joseph Beuys Lives
At this time, it is salutary to look back again at the volumes of Studio International and to be reminded of the loss of this artist. Reproduced here is the cover of the March 1986 issue (vol 199, no. 1012), featuring a photograph by Nigel Maudsley. Richard Demarco's current article, a review/reminiscence of Beuys, can also be found on our home page. From his obituary, we re-quote the memory of his first encounter with Beuys:
Joseph Beuys: Actions, Vitrines, Environments
Joseph Beuys tested the international art world to breaking point throughout his career. Now, nearly 20 years after his death, he is questioning the capacity of the art world to do justice to his theories on art and his methods of making art, which have previously resisted the efforts of art gallery directors, curators and art conservators to preserve it from its inherent vulnerability.
A tribute to Eduardo Paolozzi
Robin Spencer, Paolozzi's biographer and editor of his Writings and Interviews, has given us permission to record here the tribute that he delivered at the Memorial Reception to Sir Eduardo, which was held close to his donated collection at the Dean Gallery, Edinburgh, on the evening of Monday 25 July 2005. It was organised by Timothy Clifford, Director of the National Galleries of Scotland and Richard Calvocoressi, Director of the Scottish National Gallery of Modern Art, and other distinguished followers of the artist and his work attended.
RSA 181st Annual Exhibition
The Royal Scottish Academy (RSA) in Edinburgh has got in before the Royal Academy in London with its summer show. The RSA 2007 exhibition powerfully develops the 'Highlands and Islands' theme in contemporary art and sits well within global aspirations and directions.