Museum of Modern Art, New York
22 November 2015 – 13 March 2016
by NATASHA KURCHANOVA
A small but exciting show of Jackson Pollock (1912-56) at the Museum of Modern Art is a good reminder of the wealth and importance of the museum’s collection. Competently put together by Starr Figura, MoMA’s curator in the Department of Drawings and Prints, the show brings to our attention Pollock’s works in different media – drawings, prints, paintings, and even one decorative design on the lid of a wooden box – in a compact, but thorough overview of his career. This exhibition opens up seemingly familiar masterpieces from a new angle through thoughtful installation and inclusion of works that are usually hidden from public view.
The exhibition is arranged chronologically, dividing the artist’s oeuvre into three periods: early, transitional and mature. According to Figura, it came about as a decision to keep on view Pollock’s famous paintings, while they were temporarily removed from the permanent display during the exhibition of Pablo Picasso’s sculpture. Thanks to MoMas Picasso blockbuster, visitors now have a chance to see much more than a few canvases by, arguably, the US’s most well-known painter.
Out of 18 paintings by Pollock in the museum’s collection, 16 are in this exhibition, including famous works usually on view in the postwar collection galleries: the gigantic One: Number 31 from 1950, Number 1A from 1948 and Gothic from 1944. Apart from large canvases covered by Pollock’s signature all-over web of patterned, dripped or sculpted paint, a range of his smaller abstract paintings adds complexity to our understanding of his work as that of an “action” painter. The remarkable Full Fathom Five (1947), one of the first drip paintings, for example, must be seen in the original, because even the best reproductions cannot convey the dynamic quality of its surface, covered with paint, but also with detritus and debris, such as nails, tacks, buttons and coins buried under its thick crust, making the surface texture so charged that it appears to nearly burst with hidden energy. This painting is placed in the transitional period of the artist’s work, together with other smaller oil abstracts from the mid-40s, such as Shimmering Substance and Free Form (both 1946).
The gallery containing Pollock’s early period is the most convincing display of his attempts to integrate various influences, beginning with Thomas Hart Benton, his teacher at the Art Students League of New York in the early 30s, the Mexican muralists, and Picasso. Pollock’s work from this period is mostly representational, either untitled (in the case of prints or drawings), or bearing simple titles, such as The Flame (1938), Bird and Circle (both 1938-41). The early work shows that, from the beginning of his artistic path, Pollock tended toward tightly packed, busy compositions. As a rule, he left much more open space – untouched by the swarming crowdedness of his imagery – in his prints and works on paper.
One of the exhibition’s discoveries is the significance of prints in Pollock’s work. Of approximately 50 items on display, more than half are prints. As we learn from the exhibition, Pollock experimented with printing throughout his career, from the mid-30s up to the final decade of his life. It was obviously important for him to show variations that could be produced from one block or platen because the overall design of graphic elements is similar, but the works differ in colour and clarity of articulation.
Six untitled prints from 1943-44, displayed in a case near the entrance, vary in colour and the orientation of the image. The label informs us that the prints came from an edition of 20, and that their simplified and abstracted imagery of an eye, a head and “flailing” arms relates to the surrealist-inspired work of Joan Miró and Picasso. Surrealism is mentioned once again in a commentary accompanying 11 engravings dating from 1944-45, which were made at Atelier 17, a New York print shop operated by the British printmaker Stanley William Hayter. Hayter was fond of surrealist-inspired techniques, such as automatism, and challenged artists to experiment with creating chance images in engraving. It is clear from these prints that these experiments were essential for the development of Pollock’s painting, because the technique itself promulgated the fusion of unpredictability and a repetitive mechanical action, a guiding principle of Pollock’s art. In other words, Pollock’s active engagement with printing presents his achievement as a painter to us from a completely different angle and complicates the understanding of his work as based in physical action and unmediated involvement of the artist’s hand. Printing is as much a mechanical process as it is a handcrafted one. Knowing that Pollock used it continuously in the course of his career makes us reconsider the significance of unmediated physical involvement with material frequently attributed to his work.
As far as drawings and works on paper are concerned, the exhibition includes a few, many of which look like studies for paintings. Even though the label for the 1942 Untitled (Animals and Figures) states that “drawing was always an independent medium for Pollock, so that his sheets are never studies for paintings”, the next sentence asserts this drawing’s correspondence to two paintings from the same period hung in the same room, The Stenographic Figure (1942) and The She-Wolf (1943), “in its collection of reductive, simply outlined animals and human figures”. Indeed, from the beginning of the exposition to its end, the integration of works on paper and prints into the display of Pollock’s painting suggests rather strongly that the artist used the less formal and more intimate media to work out his ideas for painting. In the early stages of work, this is most evident in the compositional similarity and the expressive use of colour in such works as Landscape with Steer, an airbrushed lithograph from c 1936-37, and The Flame, an oil painting from c 1934-38.
Figura says her aim in this exhibition was to show the breadth of the museum’s holdings of Pollock’s work in such a way that it would highlight his work’s experimental nature and his willingness to try out different techniques and processes. This goal was aptly achieved, offering us a chance to rediscover an artist whom we thought familiar.
Making Painting: Helen Frankenthaler and JMW Turner
The first exhibition of 2014 at Turner Contemporary brings big canvases, bright colours and a return to nature, but with a fresh outlook. JMW Turner (1775-1851) and Helen Frankenthaler (1928-2011) were both artists who can be understood through their fascination and experimentation with paint, resulting in a complex understanding of the medium.
Calligraffiti: 1984/2013 – the art happening that launched the New York fall season
A vibrant collaboration between Jeffrey Deitch, who curated the show, and Leila Heller, the longtime dealer for high-end Persian art, whose eponymous gallery is staging it, Calligraffiti opened on 5 September to the same high-five vibe that had flamed the hugely missed opening nights Deitch had orchestrated at his two Soho galleries before he decamped to become director of the Los Angeles Museum of Contemporary Art.
David Smith: Personage
In a well-established American tradition of dedicated artists, David Smith the sculptor came to be lauded as a modern talent without rival. Born in 1906, he died relatively early in a truck accident in Vermont in 1965. He was indeed at the summit of his career, aged 59, and experiencing the high ground of achievement as a sculptor.
Face to Face - The Daros Collections
'Face to Face' presents the two facets, or faces, of the Daros Collections, finding similarities between works by artists from the USA and Europe and works by Latin American artists. Some of the parallels suggested by the exhibition make direct associations between one work and another. On a broader scale, when both collections are gathered together, links between them surface, providing a unique perspective on the major international art trends over a significant period of time.
Boom or clunk?
The latest press speculation that the National Lottery will be expected to transfer massive funding to bail out the 2012 Olympic Games has ramifications that extend far and wide in the sponsorship field, not least to the Heritage Lottery Fund.